The vitality of Greater Cambridge today depends on a mix of long-established businesses, start-ups, private and public sector research labs, not-for-profit organizations, the staff and students of two universities, one regional college, a major teaching hospital, and a wide array of schools. In historical terms, this “virtuous circle” is recent and fragile, and success poses new problems, particularly with housing and transportation.
Is there more we could and should be doing as an institution to take Cambridge to the world, to make the distant fen feel closer? Web-based technologies give us a new realm of possibilities for teaching, learning, and access, in a flash, access, of a kind, is simultaneously local, national, and global. Universities are expected to have attractive, navigable websites for prospective students, and most do. We do. But that is not enough now. With skill and determination, we can use new modes of communication to attract the attention of bright, inquiring students whatever their background and wherever they may be, and make Cambridge much more accessible.
There are three spheres where I believe action will serve Cambridge well in an increasingly interconnected world. First, we must assert our own unique identity with confidence and invest in it; second, we must keep energetically engaged in the future of this place, which is our place, even as we look to the horizon; third, we must step up our exploration of ways to bring Cambridge to the world. When the founders of Cambridge arrived in the fen country, it was remote from government control, a distant region of wetness, cold, goblins, and contagion. The University was part of that place then, as it is part of this place now. It will always be so. One of the greatest challenges for Collegiate Cambridge in the next few years will be to strike the right balance in our attentions: to nurture this fen, while working to ensure that it is distant no more. |